In re Duk Hee Hong
102 A.D.2d 892, 477 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19121
Opinion
— Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), dated January 5, 1984, affirmed, with one bill of costs (Figueroa v City of New York, 92 AD2d 908, 909; Matter of Morris v County of Suffolk, 88 AD2d 956, affd 58 NY2d 767). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Duk Hee Hong, 102 A.D.2d 892, 477 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
102 A.D.2d 892 (In re Duk Hee Hong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morris v. County of Suffolk
445 N.E.2d 214 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Morris v. County of Suffolk
88 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Figueroa v. City of New York
92 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)