In Re Drury

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Drury

48 S.E. 543, 136 N.C. 81, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 223

DecidedSeptember 27, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 48 S.E. 543 (In Re Drury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Drury, 48 S.E. 543, 136 N.C. 81, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 223 (N.C. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

TJpon the petition to rehear, argued at the last term, we have again examined with care the record and briefs in this cause. We find no new principle of law involved. Specific questions in regard to the boundary of the locus in quo were submitted to the jury. Evidence fit to be considered by them was introduced by the several parties to sustain their contentions. The settlement of the controversy depended almost entirely upon the questions of fact. Upon a careful examination and consideration of the entire record and argument of counsel we find no reversible error. Let the petition be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

TJpon the petition to rehear, argued at the last term, we have again examined with care the record and briefs in this cause. We find no new principle of law involved. Specific questions in regard to the boundary of the locus in quo were submitted to the jury. Evidence fit to be considered by them was introduced by the several parties to sustain their contentions. The settlement of the controversy depended almost entirely upon the questions of fact. Upon a careful examination and consideration of the entire record and argument of counsel we find no reversible error. Let the petition be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 S.E. 543, 136 N.C. 81, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-drury-nc-1904.