In re Druck

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Druck

710 A.2d 1008, 154 N.J. 1, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 439

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 29, 1998·Published

Opinion

ORDER

ANDREW DRUCK of EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, having pleaded guilty to a federal information filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, charging him with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A §§ 1343 and 2, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 13(b)(1), ANDREW DRUCK is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that ANDREW DRUCK be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that ANDREW DRUCK comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

ANDREW DRUCK of EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, having pleaded guilty to a federal information filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, charging him with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A §§ 1343 and 2, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 13(b)(1), ANDREW DRUCK is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that ANDREW DRUCK be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that ANDREW DRUCK comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

In re Druck, 710 A.2d 1008, 154 N.J. 1, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 439 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

710 A.2d 1008 (In re Druck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.