In re Drozda

582 N.E.2d 379, 1991 Ind. LEXIS 237, 1991 WL 263236
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1991
DocketNo. 45S00-9105-DI-422
StatusPublished

This text of 582 N.E.2d 379 (In re Drozda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Drozda, 582 N.E.2d 379, 1991 Ind. LEXIS 237, 1991 WL 263236 (Ind. 1991).

Opinion

ORDER OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION

Comes now the Hearing Officer previously appointed in this case and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Sections 14(g) and 15(b) and recommends that the Respondent, William Drozda, be suspended from the practice of law pending a final determination in the case.

Upon examination of the matters now before the Court, we find that the Respondent has been duly charged with misconduct by the Disciplinary Commission of the Court, the Commission has requested the temporary suspension of the Respondent pending the resolution of the proceeding, and the Respondent has agreed to such suspension. This court now further finds that the temporary suspension of the Respondent is warranted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that the Respondent, William Drozda is now suspended from the practice of law in the State of Indiana pending the final determination of this case and further order of the Court.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, to the Respondent, and serve a copy of this order of suspension as provided under Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 3(d).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
582 N.E.2d 379, 1991 Ind. LEXIS 237, 1991 WL 263236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-drozda-ind-1991.