In re: Dropbox Sign Data Breach Litigation

• Court: District Court, N.D. California
• Decided: February 20, 2026
• Docket: 4:24-cv-02637
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 || INRE: DROPBOX SIGN DATA BREACH | ©#8¢ No. 24-cv-02637-JSW LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 Re: Dkt. No. 68 1] a 12

13 Now before the Court is the motion filed by Plaintiffs for leave to file a motion for

14 || reconsideration.

15 Reconsideration is appropriate where “the district court (1) is presented with newly Q 16 |] discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3)

17 || there is an intervening change in controlling law.” County of Santa Clara v. Trump, 267 F. Supp. Zz 18 3d 1201, 1207 (N.D. Cal. 2017). Plaintiffs proffer that there has been a change in law reflected in 19 || Godun v. JustAnswer LLC, 135 F.4th 699 (9th Cir. 2025). The Court finds that there has been an 20 || intervening change in controlling law that may alter the legal analysis of whether Dropbox users 21 || manifested unambiguous assent to its Terms of Service. 22 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for 23 || reconsideration. Plaintiffs may file such a motion and set it for hearing on an available date on the 24 || Court’s regular calendar. a | 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. / f 26 Dated: February 20, 2026 NK Me 27 i i i / JEFFREY S-WHECE 28 United States District Judge