In re Dreyfuss
This text of 244 A.D. 822 (In re Dreyfuss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order denying a motion to vacate an ex parte order for the examination of the proposed defendant, before action brought, to obtain information to frame a complaint. The affidavit submitted in support of the motion shows that the proposed plaintiff has ample information upon which to predicate a complaint based upon information and belief. Therefore, there is no necessity for the examination. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dreyfuss-nyappdiv-1935.