In re Dreier

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Dreier

576 A.2d 282, 120 N.J. 154, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 308

DecidedJuly 18, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 576 A.2d 282 (In re Dreier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dreier, 576 A.2d 282, 120 N.J. 154, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 308 (N.J. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been submitted to the Court on the report of the Disciplinary Review Board recommending that HARRY DREIER of PLAINFIELD, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1976, be publicly reprimanded,

And it appearing from the Disciplinary Review Board’s report that HARRY DREIER failed to act with reasonable diligence in his capacity as a trustee and failed to communicate with the beneficiary of the trust, in violation of RPC 1.3,

And it further appearing that the foregoing misconduct and respondent’s prior public reprimand require the imposition of a public reprimand; and good cause appearing;

[155]*155It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and HARRY DREIER is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board, together with this order and the full record of the matter, be added as a permanent part of the file of said HARRY DREIER as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey; and it is further

ORDERED that HARRY DREIER reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI