In re Drayton

567 S.E.2d 470, 350 S.C. 416, 2002 S.C. LEXIS 200
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 9, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

On April 8, 2002, Respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of ninety days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Drayton, 567 S.E.2d 470, 350 S.C. 416, 2002 S.C. LEXIS 200 (S.C. 2002).

567 S.E.2d 470 (In re Drayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sabb v. South Carolina State University
567 S.E.2d 231 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)