In re D.P.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re D.P.

922 N.E.2d 969, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1506

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 2010·No. 2010-0027·Published

Opinion

Lake App. No. 2008-L-186, 2009-Ohio-6149. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387, and 2009-0189, In re Adrian R., Licking App. No. 08CA17, 2008-Ohio-6581; and briefing schedule stayed.

Cupp, J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 2008-L-186, 2009-Ohio-6149. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387, and 2009-0189, In re Adrian R., Licking App. No. 08CA17, 2008-Ohio-6581; and briefing schedule stayed.

Cupp, J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

In re D.P., 922 N.E.2d 969, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

922 N.E.2d 969 (In re D.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related