In re D.P.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re D.P.

922 N.E.2d 969, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1506

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 10, 2010

Docket2010-0027

StatusPublished

This text of 922 N.E.2d 969 (In re D.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re D.P., 922 N.E.2d 969, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Lake App. No. 2008-L-186, 2009-Ohio-6149. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387, and 2009-0189, In re Adrian R., Licking App. No. 08CA17, 2008-Ohio-6581; and briefing schedule stayed.

Cupp, J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 2008-L-186, 2009-Ohio-6149. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387, and 2009-0189, In re Adrian R., Licking App. No. 08CA17, 2008-Ohio-6581; and briefing schedule stayed.

Cupp, J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 N.E.2d 969, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dp-ohio-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack