In re Doyle
568 U.S. 1047, 133 S. Ct. 777, 2012 WL 5455964
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Doyle. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 L. Ed. 2d 928 →
Opinion
Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petitions for writs of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioners have repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioners unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petitions are submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Doyle, 568 U.S. 1047, 133 S. Ct. 777, 2012 WL 5455964 (2012).
568 U.S. 1047 (In re Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)