In re Doyle

248 A.D. 829, 290 N.Y.S. 840, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521

This text of 248 A.D. 829 (In re Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Doyle, 248 A.D. 829, 290 N.Y.S. 840, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

The parties having agreed in open court that this appeal may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: While the Court of Appeals has held that the court might relieve from certain accidents and mistakes causing delay in filing nominating certificates (Matter of Lauer v. Bd. of Elections, 262 N. Y. 416), and the same rule may apply to delay in filing declinations, the moving papers were insufficient [830]*830to invoke the exercise of discretion in favor of respondent. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Lauer v. Bd. of Elections
187 N.E. 561 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 829, 290 N.Y.S. 840, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-doyle-nyappdiv-1936.