In re Doyle

New York Court of Appeals

In re Doyle

2 N.E.3d 927, 22 N.Y.3d 999

New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 10, 2013·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that Honorable Cathryn M. Doyle is suspended, with pay, effective immediately, from the office of Surrogate of Albany County, pending disposition of her request for review of a determination by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdtjs-Salaam. Taking no part: Judge Graffeo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that Honorable Cathryn M. Doyle is suspended, with pay, effective immediately, from the office of Surrogate of Albany County, pending disposition of her request for review of a determination by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdtjs-Salaam. Taking no part: Judge Graffeo.

In re Doyle, 2 N.E.3d 927, 22 N.Y.3d 999 (N.Y. 2013).

Pincite

2 N.E.3d 927 (In re Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related