In re Doyle
This text of 693 A.2d 1173 (In re Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on February 24, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD J. DOYLE of WALL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973 and who was temporarily suspended from practice by Order of the Court dated June 21, 1996, and who remains suspended at [398]*398this time, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(c)(2) (appearance of impropriety), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that RICHARD J. DOYLE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 A.2d 1173, 149 N.J. 397, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-doyle-nj-1997.