In re Dowling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dowling

265 A.D. 710, 40 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6392

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D. 710 (In re Dowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dowling, 265 A.D. 710, 40 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On February 1, 1943, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88, and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, therefore, he must be disbarred.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On February 1, 1943, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88, and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, therefore, he must be disbarred.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D. 710, 40 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dowling-nyappdiv-1943.