In re Dowling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dowling

265 A.D. 710, 40 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6392

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1943·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On February 1, 1943, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88, and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, therefore, he must be disbarred.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On February 1, 1943, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88, and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, therefore, he must be disbarred.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

In re Dowling, 265 A.D. 710, 40 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

265 A.D. 710 (In re Dowling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.