In re Dover

268 So. 3d 1024
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 6, 2019
DocketNO. 2019-B-0401
StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 1024 (In re Dover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Dover, 268 So. 3d 1024 (La. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*1025The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in an inappropriate verbal exchange with opposing counsel in open court. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent violated Rule 3.5(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Iain A. Dover, Louisiana Bar Roll number 33540, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 So. 3d 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dover-la-2019.