In re Douglas
This text of 275 So. 3d 870 (In re Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated Rule 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Donald C. Douglas, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 22338, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 So. 3d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-douglas-la-2019.