in Re Double Diamond, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2018
Docket10-18-00060-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Double Diamond, Inc. (in Re Double Diamond, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Double Diamond, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00060-CV

IN RE DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC.

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Double Diamond, Inc., and real party in interest, White Bluff Property

Owners Association, Inc., have informed this Court that they have settled their dispute

in appellate cause number 10-18-00060-CV. Specifically, the parties filed a “Joint Motion

to Vacate and Dismiss,” requesting that we: (1) lift the abatement currently in place in

this original proceeding; (2) vacate the trial court’s orders dated October 30, 2017,

December 7, 2017, and January 9, 2018; (3) remand to the trial court for entry of take-

nothing judgments dismissing all claims with prejudice; (4) order that all costs on appeal

shall be borne by the parties or parties incurring the same; and (5) order that this Court’s

mandate shall issue immediately. After review, we grant the parties’ “Joint Motion to Vacate and Dismiss” in this

proceeding. Accordingly, we lift the abatement in this proceeding, and without regard

to the merits and effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement, we vacate the trial court’s

October 30, 2017, December 7, 2017, and January 9, 2018 orders and remand to the trial

court for entry of take-nothing judgments “dismissing Appellee’s claims against

Appellant with prejudice and dismissing Appellant’s claims against Appellee with

prejudice.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Relying on the parties’ settlement agreement, as articulated in the parties’ joint

motion in this case, we order that each party bear their own costs of court and the costs

of this proceeding shall be paid by the party incurring same. See id. at R. 42.1(a)(2)(A),

(d), 43.4. And furthermore, we order that this Court’s mandate in this proceeding shall

issue immediately.

AL SCOGGINS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted; orders vacated; proceeding remanded Opinion delivered and filed December 19, 2018 [CV06]

In re Double Diamond, Inc. Page 2 In re Double Diamond, Inc. Page 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Double Diamond, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-double-diamond-inc-texapp-2018.