Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/In re Doty

In re Doty

897 A.2d 1162, 587 Pa. 128, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 720
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 28, 2006
DocketNo. 1106 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 897 A.2d 1162 (In re Doty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Doty, 897 A.2d 1162, 587 Pa. 128, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 720 (Pa. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2006, a Rule having been entered by this Court on January 26, 2006, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Richard Kanoy Doty to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Richard Kanoy Doty is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
897 A.2d 1162, 587 Pa. 128, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-doty-pa-2006.