In re Doty

7 F. Cas. 957, 10 Chi. Leg. News 1, 16 Nat. Bank. Reg. 202, 1877 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139
District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided August 22, 1877·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

NELSON, District Judge.

I answer the question certified in the negative, and agree to the conclusion reached by the learned judge of the Massachusetts district. In re Kingsley [Case No. 7,S19]. The rule that no debt may be proved in bankruptcy on which an action could not be maintained against the bankrupt in the state where the petition is filed, in case bankruptcy proceedings were not instituted, commends itself to my judgment The statute of Minnesota provides that an action could "only be commenced'’ to enforce the debt referred to in the question [958] certified within six years. The construction by the supreme court of the state of this statute is, that the bar is complete and the statute need not be pleaded. The fact that it appears upon the face of a complaint that the cause of action is barred by statute, is good ground for demurrer, and for reversal of a judgment upon a writ of error. 11 Minn. 320 [Gil. 224].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Doty, 7 F. Cas. 957, 10 Chi. Leg. News 1, 16 Nat. Bank. Reg. 202, 1877 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139 (mnd 1877).

7 F. Cas. 957 (In re Doty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Resler
95 F. 804 (D. Minnesota, 1899)
In re Boyd
3 F. Cas. 1091 (D. Oregon, 1877)