in Re: Dorothy Cato
This text of in Re: Dorothy Cato (in Re: Dorothy Cato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 18, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-01019-CV
IN RE DOROTHY CATO, Relator
_________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On September 17, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t. Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator also filed a motion for emergency stay.
We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 18, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Hudson, and Fowler.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Dorothy Cato, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dorothy-cato-texapp-2003.