In Re Dorothy Ann Hunt v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued November 21, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
robbery.1 Hunt requests that this Court “issue a [w]rit of [m]andamus to [the 183rd District Court of Harris County] to hear the attached [p]etition and [p]raecipe.”
Our review of Hunt’s mandamus petition reflects that she has failed to establish that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7, 52.8; see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny Hunt’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
1 Fletcher appealed from his conviction for aggravated robbery, which was affirmed by this Court. See Fletcher v. State, No. 01-15-00966-CR, 2016 WL 6962307 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 29, 2016, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Dorothy Ann Hunt v. the State of Texas (In Re Dorothy Ann Hunt v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.