In re Doro
224 A.D.2d 1039, 638 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1802
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 1996
StatusPublished
This text of 224 A.D.2d 1039 (In re Doro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Doro, 224 A.D.2d 1039, 638 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
—Order of suspension entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default. Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 1039, 638 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-doro-nyappdiv-1996.