Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/In Re Dooley

In Re Dooley

306 S.W.3d 414, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1228, 2010 WL 610945
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 23, 2010
Docket05-09-01061-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 414 (In Re Dooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Dooley, 306 S.W.3d 414, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1228, 2010 WL 610945 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

NUNC PRO TUNC OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MURPHY.

On September 3, 2009, relator filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, but did not file a petition for writ of mandamus. On September 23, 2009, we sent relator a letter informing him that we would take no action on his motion until a petition was filed. Although we have received occasional correspondence from relator, no petition has been filed to date. Accordingly, we DISMISS this case. Any petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator in the future will be filed under a new cause number.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Service Lloyds Insurance Co. v. American Alternative Insurance Corp.
306 S.W.3d 414 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 S.W.3d 414, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1228, 2010 WL 610945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dooley-texapp-2010.