In Re Dooley

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Dooley

306 S.W.3d 414, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1228, 2010 WL 610945

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 23, 2010·No. 05-09-01061-CV·Published

Opinion

NUNC PRO TUNC OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MURPHY.

On September 3, 2009, relator filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, but did not file a petition for writ of mandamus. On September 23, 2009, we sent relator a letter informing him that we would take no action on his motion until a petition was filed. Although we have received occasional correspondence from relator, no petition has been filed to date. Accordingly, we DISMISS this case. Any petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator in the future will be filed under a new cause number.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUNC PRO TUNC OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MURPHY.

On September 3, 2009, relator filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, but did not file a petition for writ of mandamus. On September 23, 2009, we sent relator a letter informing him that we would take no action on his motion until a petition was filed. Although we have received occasional correspondence from relator, no petition has been filed to date. Accordingly, we DISMISS this case. Any petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator in the future will be filed under a new cause number.

In Re Dooley, 306 S.W.3d 414, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1228, 2010 WL 610945 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

306 S.W.3d 414 (In Re Dooley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related