In re Donovan E.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Donovan E.

106 A.D.2d 446, 482 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21483

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.2d 446 (In re Donovan E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Donovan E., 106 A.D.2d 446, 482 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), dated August 31, 1983, which, upon a fact-finding determination of the same court (Esquirol, J.), made after a hearing, that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of rape in the first degree (three counts) and sodomy in the first degree, placed him on probation for one year. The appeal brings up for review said fact-finding determination.

Fact-finding determination and order of disposition affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant committed the acts of which he was found guilty (Matter of Derrick C., 52 AD2d 522).

We have considered appellant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), dated August 31, 1983, which, upon a fact-finding determination of the same court (Esquirol, J.), made after a hearing, that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of rape in the first degree (three counts) and sodomy in the first degree, placed him on probation for one year. The appeal brings up for review said fact-finding determination.

Fact-finding determination and order of disposition affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant committed the acts of which he was found guilty (Matter of Derrick C., 52 AD2d 522).

We have considered appellant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 446, 482 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-donovan-e-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack