in Re: Donny L. Bretz
This text of in Re: Donny L. Bretz (in Re: Donny L. Bretz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
|
IN RE: DONNY L. BRETZ |
' |
No. 08-02-00538-CR AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS |
OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Relator Donny L. Bretz seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to appoint him an attorney to assist with the filing of a motion for forensic DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c) (Vernon Supp. 2003). Bretz claims that he filed a motion requesting counsel and that the trial court denied the motion without conducting a hearing. Bretz has not, however, provided this Court with a certified or sworn copy of the trial court=s order denying the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j)(1)(A). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. This denial does not constitute a ruling on the merits of Bretz=s complaint.
January 30, 2003
RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice
Before Panel No. 4
Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and McClure, JJ.
(Do not publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Donny L. Bretz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-donny-l-bretz-texapp-2003.