In re Dong Sung Kim
This text of 58 A.3d 729 (In re Dong Sung Kim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-188, concluding that DONG SUNG KIM of PALISADES PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2009, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b)(failure to communicate basis or rate of fee in writing), and RPC 3.3(lack of candor toward tribunal), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that DONG SUNG KIM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
[561]*561ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A.3d 729, 212 N.J. 560, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dong-sung-kim-nj-2013.