In re Doney
This text of 507 P.2d 522 (In re Doney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMO OPINION
Original proceeding. Petitioner, appearing pro se, and presently confined in the Montana State Prison, has filed a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus.
This Court entered its decision on the appeal from his conviction by this petitioner on February 20, 1973. See State v. Spurlock and Doney, 161 Mont. 388, 506 P.2d 842. Petitioner during his trial and upon that appeal was represented by counsel. No petition for rehearing was filed following the promulgation of the decision.
The petition now presented pro se is merely a reargument of the same grounds raised upon the appeal. These contentions were not accepted by this Court and nothing new is raised by this petition and therefore it is ordered that the relief sought be denied and this proceeding is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
507 P.2d 522, 161 Mont. 546, 1973 Mont. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-doney-mont-1973.