in Re: Donald Wayne Thieleman
This text of in Re: Donald Wayne Thieleman (in Re: Donald Wayne Thieleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-118-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG _______________________________________________________
IN RE: DONALD WAYNE THIELEMAN _______________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus _______________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
Relator, Donald Wayne Thieleman, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the
above cause on January 18, 2008. However, the party filing a petition for a writ of
mandamus bears the burden of providing the court with a sufficient record to establish the
petitioner's right to mandamus relief. TEX . R. APP. P. 52.7. The rules that govern our
review of relator's petition require, for example, that the petition be accompanied by a
certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator's claim for relief and
that was filed in any underlying proceeding. See id. at rule 52.7(a)(1); see also id. at rule
1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) ("W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so."); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). 52.3(j) (required contents of appendix to petition include certified or sworn copy of "any
order complained of"). Relator has not submitted an appendix or any other material
constituting a record to support his petition. He, therefore, cannot demonstrate that the
trial court has abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,
is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.
Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See id. at rule 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 25th day of March, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Donald Wayne Thieleman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-donald-wayne-thieleman-texapp-2008.