in Re Donald Wayne Read
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00263-CV ___________________________
IN RE DONALD WAYNE READ, Relator
Original Proceeding Trial Court No. 141-293386-17
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Pittman, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus to order the
court reporter to supply him with the reporter’s record from the trial that resulted in
his felony driving-while-intoxicated conviction, which was affirmed by the Eastland
Court of Appeals in 2015. See Read v. State, No. 11-13-00344-CR, 2015 WL 6121536,
at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland Oct. 15, 2015, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for
publication). Because we lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a court
reporter unless the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, see In re Deba, No. 04-
19-00414-CR, 2019 WL 2783914, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 3, 2019, orig.
proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.); In re Calton, No. 02-15-00280-CV, 2015 WL
5175467, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 4, 2015, orig. proceeding) (per curiam)
(mem. op.), and relator has made no such argument or showing, we dismiss relator’s
petition for writ of mandamus.
Per Curiam
Delivered: July 26, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Donald Wayne Read (in Re Donald Wayne Read) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.