In re Donald W.

225 A.D.2d 701, 639 N.Y.2d 931, 639 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Family Court properly denied the petitioner’s application on the ground that he failed to demonstrate "good cause” as required by Domestic Relations Law § 114. The reason proffered by the petitioner in his initial application to the Family Court, i.e., he wanted it for his "files”, was patently insufficient. The medical and psychological grounds proffered by the petitioner are presented for the first time on appeal and are therefore not properly before this Court. In any event, they are insufficient because they have not been credibly substantiated by affidavits from health professional experts (see generally, Matter of Linda F. M., 52 NY2d 236, 240; Matter of Wilson, 153 AD2d 748; Matter of Chattman v Bennett, 57 AD2d 618). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Donald W., 225 A.D.2d 701, 639 N.Y.2d 931, 639 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 701 (In re Donald W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Michael Z.
38 A.D.3d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)