In re: Donald Trump

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re: Donald Trump. Read the opinion of the Court — 928 F.3d 360
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2019·No. 18-2486·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

FILED: October 15, 2019

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 18-2486 (8:17-cv-01596-PJM) ___________________

In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity

Petitioner

------------------------------

PROFESSOR CLARK D. CUNNINGHAM; PROFESSOR JESSE EGBERT

Amici Curiae

SCHOLAR SETH BARRETT TILLMAN; JUDICIAL EDUCATION PROJECT

Amici Supporting Petitioner

FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIALS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; THE NISKANEN CENTER; REPUBLICAN WOMEN FOR PROGRESS; CHERI JACOBUS; TOM COLEMAN; EMIL H. FRANKEL; JOEL SEARBY; ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AND FEDERAL COURTS SCHOLARS; CERTAIN LEGAL HISTORIANS

Amici Supporting Respondents ___________________

ORDER ___________________

A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having

voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the petition for rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted.

The parties and any amici curiae shall file 15 additional paper copies of their

briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days.

This case is scheduled for oral argument on Thursday, December 12, 2019, in

Richmond, Virginia.

For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Donald Trump, (4th Cir. 2019).

In re: Donald Trump (In re: Donald Trump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.