in Re Donald Ray Lee, Latricia Doyal, Paulette Savage, and Jonathan Chase
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00087-CV
In re Donald Ray Lee, Latricia Doyal, Paulette Savage, and Jonathan Chase
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM MCCULLOCH COUNTY
DISSENTING OPINION
I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes that “the language of section 9.04 is
ambiguous, at best, concerning what review, if any, the Secretary can perform with regard to the
sufficiency of the petition beyond verifying the number of signatures of qualified voters.” Given the
majority’s conclusion of ambiguity, I am hard pressed to conclude that the Secretary or the members
of the City Council failed to perform a ministerial act that is subject to mandamus by this Court
under the confines of our standard of review. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (1992)
(mandamus available to compel a public official to perform ministerial act); Anderson v. City of
Seven Points, 806 S.W.2d 791, 793 (Tex. 1991) (stating that “[a]ct is ministerial when the law
clearly spells out the duty to be performed by the official with sufficient specificity that nothing is
left to the exercise of discretion”). I would accordingly deny the petition. __________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field
Filed: February 28, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Donald Ray Lee, Latricia Doyal, Paulette Savage, and Jonathan Chase (in Re Donald Ray Lee, Latricia Doyal, Paulette Savage, and Jonathan Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.