in Re: Donald J. Randle

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 5, 2002
Docket01-02-01229-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Donald J. Randle (in Re: Donald J. Randle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Donald J. Randle, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued December 5, 2002





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-02-01229-CV



IN RE DONALD J. RANDLE, Relator



Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Donald J. Randle, requests that this Court compel respondent (1) to hold a bench trial and rule on all motions in cause number 926598.

There are three prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court, namely: (1) the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2) the relator must make a demand for performance; and (3) the subject court must refuse that request. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Relator has not provided us with a record that shows that he made any request of the respondent to perform a nondiscretionary act that respondent refused.

The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM



Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Radack.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1.

Respondent is the Honorable Joan Campbell, Judge, 248th District Court, Harris County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Donald J. Randle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-donald-j-randle-texapp-2002.