in Re: Donald Gene Blanton

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 9, 2014·No. 05-14-00543-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed May 9, 2014.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00543-CV

IN RE DONALD GENE BLANTON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 23592-86

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus alleging that the trial court has failed to

hold a hearing on his claim of actual innocence. This Court has not been given general

supervisory control over district and county courts. Texas Emp. Ins. Ass'n v. Kirby, 150 S.W.2d

123, 126 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1941, no writ); see also Guillory v. Davis, 527 S.W.2d 465,

466 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1975, no writ). The underlying nature of relator’s complaint is

that he has is being illegally confined following conviction of a felony. That sort of claim must

be raised by petition for writ of habeas corpus. While the courts of appeals have concurrent

mandamus jurisdiction with the Court of Criminal Appeals in some post-conviction proceedings,

Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805, 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (forensic DNA testing), only

the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in cases collaterally attacking a final judgment of

conviction of a felony. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); In re

Turk, No. 14-09-00129-CR, 2009 WL 396197, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 19, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re Bailey, No. 14-06-00841-CV, 2006 WL 2827249, at *1 (Tex.

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715,

717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). “Article 11.07 contains no role for

the courts of appeals; the only courts referred to are the convicting court and the Court of

Criminal Appeals.” In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d at 718. Accordingly, we DISMISS the petition for

writ of mandamus.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

140543F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Donald Gene Blanton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re: Donald Gene Blanton (in Re: Donald Gene Blanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guillory v. Davis
527 S.W.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Padilla v. McDaniel
122 S.W.3d 805 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Kirby
150 S.W.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)