In re: Donahue

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 24, 2023·No. SCOT-23-0000559·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX

24-OCT-2023

11:36 AM

Dkt. 13 ORD

SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

IN RE COCHRAN DONAHUE

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Browning and Circuit Judge Crabtree, assigned by reason of vacancies)

On October 2, 2023 an individual using the name Cochran Donahue submitted to the appellate clerk’s office documents for filing, along with a motion for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. We construe the submission as a petition for a writ of mandamus for a declaratory judgment, confirming the identity of the individual, directed at an unnamed public official. Upon review of the document, we conclude that it fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief from this court. See State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. Huddy, 82 Hawaiʼi 188, 193, 921 P.2d 108, 113 (1996). We further conclude that the information

provided in the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, submitted under penalty of perjury, warrants granting the motion. Therefore, It is ordered that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The clerk shall waive the filing fee in this matter.

It is further ordered that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 24, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ R. Mark Browning

/s/ Jeffrey P. Crabtree

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Donahue, (haw 2023).

In re: Donahue (In re: Donahue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. Huddy
921 P.2d 108 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)