in Re: Don Rosenburg, Sharon Highfill and William Butera
This text of in Re: Don Rosenburg, Sharon Highfill and William Butera (in Re: Don Rosenburg, Sharon Highfill and William Butera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 24, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00274-CV
IN RE DON ROSENBERG, SHARON HIGHFILL, and WILLIAM BUTERA, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On March 15, 2005, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 24, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Don Rosenburg, Sharon Highfill and William Butera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-don-rosenburg-sharon-highfill-and-william-bu-texapp-2005.