in Re Don A. Wade
This text of in Re Don A. Wade (in Re Don A. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00452-CV
In re Don A. Wade
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM CALDWELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Don A. Wade, acting pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking
this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directed to the Caldwell County Clerk. By statute, this Court
has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court
of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t
Code § 22.221. The Caldwell County Clerk is not a party against whom we may issue a writ of
mandamus. Nor has Wade demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce
our jurisdiction. We have no jurisdiction to grant Wade any relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ
of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Filed: July 28, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Don A. Wade, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-don-a-wade-texapp-2015.