in Re: Dominique Uribe
This text of in Re: Dominique Uribe (in Re: Dominique Uribe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00480-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: DOMINIQUE URIBE
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1 Relator, Dominique Uribe, filed a petition for writ of mandamus by which he requests
that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Sandra Watts, presiding judge of the
117th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, to reform relator’s judgment and
sentence in trial court cause number 03-CR-3717-B. This Court, having examined and fully considered relator’s petition, is of the opinion
that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition should be
denied. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is
DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 24th day of August, 2009.
1 See T E X . R. A PP . P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions), 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Dominique Uribe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dominique-uribe-texapp-2009.