in Re: Dominique Uribe

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2009
Docket13-09-00480-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Dominique Uribe (in Re: Dominique Uribe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Dominique Uribe, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00480-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: DOMINIQUE URIBE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1 Relator, Dominique Uribe, filed a petition for writ of mandamus by which he requests

that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Sandra Watts, presiding judge of the

117th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, to reform relator’s judgment and

sentence in trial court cause number 03-CR-3717-B. This Court, having examined and fully considered relator’s petition, is of the opinion

that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition should be

denied. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is

DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 24th day of August, 2009.

1 See T E X . R. A PP . P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions), 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Dominique Uribe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dominique-uribe-texapp-2009.