In re Dolan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Dolan

624 A.2d 1370, 132 N.J. 272, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 113

DecidedJune 9, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 624 A.2d 1370 (In re Dolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dolan, 624 A.2d 1370, 132 N.J. 272, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 113 (N.J. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

[273]*273ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MARTIN C.X. DOLAN of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to safeguard property) in his handling of six matters and Rule l:20-3(f) (failure to cooperate with the District Ethics Committee), and the Board having further recommended that respondent practice under the supervision of a proctor and submit quarterly psychiatric reports to the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and MARTIN C.X. DOLAN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent practice under the supervision of a proctor approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent submit quarterly psychiatric reports to the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

[274]*274ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[273]*273ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MARTIN C.X. DOLAN of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to safeguard property) in his handling of six matters and Rule l:20-3(f) (failure to cooperate with the District Ethics Committee), and the Board having further recommended that respondent practice under the supervision of a proctor and submit quarterly psychiatric reports to the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and MARTIN C.X. DOLAN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent practice under the supervision of a proctor approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent submit quarterly psychiatric reports to the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

[274]*274ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

624 A.2d 1370, 132 N.J. 272, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dolan-nj-1993.