In re Doerger

613 N.E.2d 239, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1498
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1993·No. 92-2323·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

On motion for imposition of punishment for contempt. A1 Doerger must purge himself of contempt or an order for his incarceration will issue, effective June 14, 1993. The contemnor shall purge himself by appearing before the Cincinnati Bar Association pursuant to its subpoena duces tecum, by producing documents as directed in the subpoena duces tecum, and by testifying in response to the bar association’s questions. If the contemnor fails to purge himself, he shall be incarcerated until such time as he fully complies with the orders of this court.

Wright, J., dissents and would fine the contemnor $1,000, which fine would be referred to the Attorney General for collection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Doerger, 613 N.E.2d 239, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1498 (Ohio 1993).

613 N.E.2d 239 (In re Doerger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey
2000 Ohio 4 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)