In re Doe

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Doe

767 N.E.2d 731, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1444

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 9, 2002

Docket2002-0251

StatusPublished

This text of 767 N.E.2d 731 (In re Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Doe, 767 N.E.2d 731, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1444 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness, No. 198. On February 8, 2002, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that the applicant, John Doe, not be approved for admission to the practice of law and that he not be permitted to reapply. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the board is accepted. The applicant is denied admission to practice in Ohio and shall not be permitted to reapply.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents in part because she would not seal the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness, No. 198. On February 8, 2002, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that the applicant, John Doe, not be approved for admission to the practice of law and that he not be permitted to reapply. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the board is accepted. The applicant is denied admission to practice in Ohio and shall not be permitted to reapply.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents in part because she would not seal the record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 N.E.2d 731, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-doe-ohio-2002.