in Re Doctors Practice Management, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Doctors Practice Management, Inc.

DecidedDecember 15, 2022

Docket14-22-00832-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Doctors Practice Management, Inc. (in Re Doctors Practice Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Doctors Practice Management, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 15, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00832-CV

IN RE DOCTORS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-47864

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 28, 2022, relator Doctors Practice Management, Inc. filed an a amended petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Rabeea Collier, presiding judge of the 113th District Court of Harris County, to: (1) vacate her September 28, 2021 order; (2) vacate her October 25, 2022 orders; (3) vacate her November 15, 2022 orders; and (4) sign an order protecting confidential information. On November 14, 2022, this court advised relator that its petition was subject to dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1), and 52.7(a)(2). Relator has cured the deficiencies in its petition.

After reviewing relator’s amended petition, we conclude that relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and dismiss its motion to stay as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 15, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00832-CV

IN RE DOCTORS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-47864

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 28, 2022, relator Doctors Practice Management, Inc. filed an a amended petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Rabeea Collier, presiding judge of the 113th District Court of Harris County, to: (1) vacate her September 28, 2021 order; (2) vacate her October 25, 2022 orders; (3) vacate her November 15, 2022 orders; and (4) sign an order protecting confidential information. On November 14, 2022, this court advised relator that its petition was subject to dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1), and 52.7(a)(2). Relator has cured the deficiencies in its petition.

After reviewing relator’s amended petition, we conclude that relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and dismiss its motion to stay as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Doctors Practice Management, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-doctors-practice-management-inc-texapp-2022.