In re Dobis

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Dobis

791 A.2d 215, 171 N.J. 33, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1828

DecidedMarch 8, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 791 A.2d 215 (In re Dobis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dobis, 791 A.2d 215, 171 N.J. 33, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1828 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-252, concluding that KENNETH S. DOBIS of FORKED RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded on the basis of his criminal conviction of violation of 16 U.S.C.A. § 3372(a)(2), (importing protected wildlife without a permit) a misdemeanor, said conviction constituting clear and convincing evidence of violation of RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH S. DOBIS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[34]*34ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-252, concluding that KENNETH S. DOBIS of FORKED RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded on the basis of his criminal conviction of violation of 16 U.S.C.A. § 3372(a)(2), (importing protected wildlife without a permit) a misdemeanor, said conviction constituting clear and convincing evidence of violation of RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH S. DOBIS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[34]*34ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

791 A.2d 215, 171 N.J. 33, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dobis-nj-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack