Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re D.M.D.

In re D.M.D.

65 N.E.3d 717, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 2016
DocketNo. 2015-0738
StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.E.3d 717 (In re D.M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re D.M.D., 65 N.E.3d 717, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322 (Ohio 2016).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re D.S.
2016 Ohio 1027 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.E.3d 717, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dmd-ohio-2016.