In re D.M.D.

65 N.E.3d 717, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 2016·No. No. 2015-0738·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re D.M.D., 65 N.E.3d 717, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322 (Ohio 2016).

65 N.E.3d 717 (In re D.M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re D.S.
2016 Ohio 1027 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)