In re D.M.

11 N.E.3d 283, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1427

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 2014·No. 2013-0579·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-120794, 2013-Ohio-668. On motions to supplement the record. Motions denied.

Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re D.M., 11 N.E.3d 283, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1427 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

11 N.E.3d 283 (In re D.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

2013 Ohio 668 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)