In re Dizak
This text of 277 A.D.2d 50 (In re Dizak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Petitioner’s motion for, inter alia, a hearing de novo denied; cross-motion granted and Determination of Hearing Panel, which confirmed the Referee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation that petitioner’s application for reinstatement as an [51]*51attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York be denied, confirmed. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Rubin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 50, 718 N.Y.S.2d 813, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dizak-nyappdiv-2000.