In re Dizak

252 A.D.2d 459, 676 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8716

This text of 252 A.D.2d 459 (In re Dizak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Dizak, 252 A.D.2d 459, 676 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Motion for reinstatement denied without prejudice to renew upon the submission of proof that petitioner has entered into a satisfactory restitution arrangement with the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection. No opinion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli, Tom and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 459, 676 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dizak-nyappdiv-1998.