In re Dizak
92 A.D.2d 791, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Dizak. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 A.D.2d 680 →
Opinion
— Counsel relieved with the grateful thanks of this court, and a special referee appointed to take immediate possession of the files of respondent’s clients and to take action as indicated in the order of this court, respondent’s suspension continued until the further order of this court, and the application for an order striking the name of respondent from the roll of attorneys is adjourned until April 5, 1983. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Milonas, Silverman, Bloom and Alexander, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Dizak, 92 A.D.2d 791, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
92 A.D.2d 791 (In re Dizak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.