In Re Ditto

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Uliniteb fitatea (11101117th appeals {01‘th jfeheral Qtirtutt

IN RE FRANK ROBERT DITTO

2012-1 182 (Serial No. 09/276,1 37)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Frank Robert Ditto, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court treats Ditto’s submission as his response to the July 11, 2012 order disrnissing this appeal for failure to pay the filing fee.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The July 11, 2012 dismissal order is vacated, the appeal is reinstated, and the mandate is recalled.

IN RE DITTO 2

(3) The Director should calculate the due date for his brief from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 2 6 2012 [5/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Frank Robert Ditto

Raymond T. Chen, Esq. 82 1 U.S. COUR'fIOIEEAlPJPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 2 6 ZUIZ JAN HUBBALY

‘ CLERK