In re Discipline of Soukup

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Discipline of Soukup

177 N.W.2d 50, 287 Minn. 535, 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1164

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 8, 1970

DocketNo. 42343

StatusPublished

This text of 177 N.W.2d 50 (In re Discipline of Soukup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Discipline of Soukup, 177 N.W.2d 50, 287 Minn. 535, 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1164 (Mich. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners by service upon respondent, Bailey A. Soukup, on March 17,1970, of a petition and accusation, together with an order of the Supreme Court requiring respondent to answer the accusations contained therein within 20 days after such service, pursuant to the rules of this court. It having been made to appear to this court that no answer to said petition has been received and no other pleading has been served or filed by respondent, and that he is now in default.

Now, therefore, pursuant to the rules of this court

It Is Hereby Ordered that said respondent, Bailey A. Soukup, be and he is hereby disbarred, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners by service upon respondent, Bailey A. Soukup, on March 17,1970, of a petition and accusation, together with an order of the Supreme Court requiring respondent to answer the accusations contained therein within 20 days after such service, pursuant to the rules of this court. It having been made to appear to this court that no answer to said petition has been received and no other pleading has been served or filed by respondent, and that he is now in default.

Now, therefore, pursuant to the rules of this court

It Is Hereby Ordered that said respondent, Bailey A. Soukup, be and he is hereby disbarred, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this state.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 N.W.2d 50, 287 Minn. 535, 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-discipline-of-soukup-minn-1970.